Item Analysis - Survey: Grade

Label

Frequency

Percent

K

6

10.34

1

7

12.07

2

9

15.52

3

12

20.69

4

9

15.52

5

7

12.07

6

8

13.79

Total Valid

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: Years of Use

Label

Frequency

Percent

1

9

15.52

2

10

17.24

3

38

65.52

Total Valid

57

98.28

Total Missing

1

1.72

Total

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: Teaching Experience

Label

Frequency

Percent

0-5

4

6.90

6-15

13

22.41

15+

41

70.69

Total Valid

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: Technological Profficiency

Label

Frequency

Percent

Beginner

1

1.72

Some Skills

29

50.00

Skilled

25

43.10

Expert

3

5.17

Total Valid

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: School

Label

Frequency

Percent

Airport

9

15.52

Brooklyn

14

24.14

Valley View

14

24.14

Comox

9

15.52

Huband

7

12.07

Robb

5

8.62

Total Valid

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: Report Writer or PRS has reduced the time necessary tp produce reports.

Label

Frequency

Percent

Strongly Disagree

2

3.45

Disagree

5

8.62

Neither Agree Nor Disagree

5

8.62

Agree

18

31.03

Strongly Agree

28

48.28

Total Valid

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: Parents have responded favorably to this type of reporting.

Label

Frequency

Percent

Strongly Disagree

0

0.00

Disagree

1

1.72

Neither Agree Nor Disagree

22

37.93

Agree

21

36.21

Strongly Agree

14

24.14

Total Valid

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: The software has been easy to learn and use.

Label

Frequency

Percent

Strongly Disagree

2

3.45

Disagree

10

17.24

Neither Agree Nor Disagree

7

12.07

Agree

30

51.72

Strongly Agree

8

13.79

Total Valid

57

98.28

Total Missing

1

1.72

Total

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: Teacher inservice and support has been adequate.

Label

Frequency

Percent

Strongly Disagree

0

0.00

Disagree

9

15.52

Neither Agree Nor Disagree

14

24.14

Agree

24

41.38

Strongly Agree

10

17.24

Total Valid

57

98.28

Total Missing

1

1.72

Total

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: Technology support has been adequate.

Label

Frequency

Percent

Strongly Disagree

2

3.45

Disagree

10

17.24

Neither Agree Nor Disagree

12

20.69

Agree

28

48.28

Strongly Agree

4

6.90

Total Valid

56

96.55

Total Missing

2

3.45

Total

58

100.00




Item Analysis - Survey: I recommend that the District  continue with this style of outcome-based reporting

Label

Frequency

Percent

Strongly Disagree

1

1.72

Disagree

1

1.72

Neither Agree Nor Disagree

3

5.17

Agree

16

27.59

Strongly Agree

31

53.45

Total Valid

52

89.66

Total Missing

6

10.34

Total

58

100.00